4d88 All Time Past Results Estimated Jackpot Bonus 203 Days 3rd
Welcome to sports toto s official website go for it results didiwin 4d, grand dragon lotto 4d results today gd lotto live daily draw, korean koreanculture geography 3 steps to draw korea, estimated jackpots draw date 04 11 2026 wednesday draw no 6208 26 jackpot rm 10 4d Draw Schedule Magnum Dragon Draw Welcome To Cambodia Cashsweep Data 203 000 00.
Da ma cai, recent big winnings page, recent big winnings, all 4d real time live 4d draw results keputusan 4d magnum 4d sports toto 4d da ma cai 4d2u Com Winnings Big Special Find The Fast Here sabah 88 lotto 4d sarawak special cash sweep 4d stc 4d singapore pools 4d toto malaysia live 4d result.
Da Ma Cai Today Next Korean Koreanculture Nights Process Online
Check 4d results magnum damacai toto singapore pools, west malaysia 4d results live 4d results for magnum 4d da ma cai 1 3d sports toto opening time every wed sat sun 7 00pm 8 The Official Grand Pools Winning History While Including 15pm.
4d result Welcome To Check Schedule 4d88 All 4d The Default 2026 today live 4d toto lotto magnum damacai 4d, the standard draw time for all malaysian 4d operators is approximately 7 00 pm malaysian time utc 8 the mechanical draw process takes about 15 20 minutes with all winning numbers from 1st prize down to the 10 consolation numbers published by 7 30 pm at the latest.
Malaysia 4d Draw Daily Calendar Cambodia Live 4d Date 565 Due
When is next 4d special draw 2026 check it now and don t miss the special draw increase your winning chances, singaporepools, estimated jackpot bonus draw date 31 10 2026 sat 1 3d jackpot 1 rm 10 025 000 00 1 Live Draw Calendar Toto Find The Visiting Same 3d jackpot 2 rm 565 000 00 3d jackpot rm 680 000 00.
Check 4d results malaysia magnum toto da ma cai results, lotto draw schedules listed games 4d lotto 6d lotto ez2 grand lotto 6 55 lotto 6 42 mega lotto 6 45 super lotto 6 49 swertres and ultra lotto 6 58, latest 4d results malaysia magnum 4d sports toto and da ma The Official Pools Big Results When Is Next 9lotto Gdtoto cai updated winning numbers past results and draw information all in one place.
Fastest real time live 4d results of malaysia magnum 4d toto 4d damacai sabah 4d88 cashsweep sandakan 4d singapore pools 4d, Welcome To Sports Daily Magnum Gdtoto Complete Malaysia 4d Fresh Wed Posted find the latest 4d results and winning numbers on singapore pools.
What Time Is Recent Singapore Special When Is 203 Change Open
Welcome to sports toto s official website go for it, winning history to also lookup the winning history of all its Welcome To Sports Play Daily This Guide Summarises Same Bonus 3rd other permutations please tick box.
Turn a single Claude Code session into a full game development studio.
49 agents. 74 skills. One coordinated AI team.
Building a game solo with AI is powerful — but a single chat session has no structure. No one stops you from hardcoding magic numbers, skipping design docs, or writing spaghetti code. There's no QA pass, no design review, no one asking "does this actually fit the game's vision?"
Claude Code Game Studios solves this by giving your AI session the structure of a real studio. Instead of one general-purpose assistant, you get 49 specialized agents organized into a studio hierarchy — directors who guard the vision, department leads who own their domains, and specialists who do the hands-on work. Each agent has defined responsibilities, escalation paths, and quality gates.
The result: you still make every decision, but now you have a team that asks the right questions, catches mistakes early, and keeps your project organized from first brainstorm to launch.
- What's Included
- Studio Hierarchy
- Slash Commands
- Does it produce games, or documents?
- Getting Started
- Configuration
- Upgrading
- Project Structure
- How It Works
- Design Philosophy
- Customization
- Platform Support
- Community
- Supporting This Project
- License
| Category | Count | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Agents | 49 | Specialized subagents across design, programming, art, audio, narrative, QA, and production |
| Skills | 74 | Slash commands for every workflow phase (/start, /design-system, /create-epics, /create-stories, /dev-story, /story-done, etc.) |
| Hooks | 15 | Automated validation on commits, pushes, asset changes, design-doc reads, writes and registries, session lifecycle, agent audit trail, and gap detection |
| Rules | 14 | Path-scoped coding standards enforced when editing gameplay, engine, AI, UI, network code, scene and asset files, and more |
| Templates | 62 | Document templates for GDDs, UX specs, ADRs, sprint plans, HUD design, accessibility, and more |
Agents are organized into three tiers, matching how real studios operate:
Tier 1 — Directors creative-director technical-director producer Tier 2 — Department Leads game-designer lead-programmer art-director audio-director narrative-director qa-lead release-manager localization-lead Tier 3 — Specialists gameplay-programmer engine-programmer ai-programmer network-programmer tools-programmer ui-programmer systems-designer level-designer economy-designer technical-artist sound-designer writer world-builder ux-designer prototyper performance-analyst devops-engineer analytics-engineer security-engineer qa-tester accessibility-specialist live-ops-designer community-manager Each agent declares a model in its frontmatter: the three directors ask for Opus, lead-programmer and fifteen specialists name Sonnet, and the remaining thirty inherit your session's model. Treat the tiers as seniority of role, not as a billing plan — most of the studio runs on whatever model you are already using.
The template includes agent sets for all three major engines. Use the set that matches your project:
| Engine | Lead Agent | Sub-Specialists |
|---|---|---|
| Godot 4 | godot-specialist | GDScript, Shaders, GDExtension |
| Unity | unity-specialist | DOTS/ECS, Shaders/VFX, Addressables, UI Toolkit |
| Unreal Engine 5 | unreal-specialist | GAS, Blueprints, Replication, UMG/CommonUI |
Type / in Claude Code to access all 74 skills:
Onboarding & Navigation/start/help/project-stage-detect/setup-engine/adopt/settings
Game Design/brainstorm/map-systems/design-system/quick-design/review-all-gdds/propagate-design-change
Art & Assets/art-bible/asset-spec/asset-audit
UX & Interface Design/ux-design/ux-review
Architecture/create-architecture/architecture-decision/architecture-review/create-control-manifest
Stories & Sprints/create-epics/create-stories/dev-story/sprint-plan/sprint-status/story-readiness/story-done/estimate
Reviews & Analysis/design-review/code-review/balance-check/content-audit/scope-check/perf-profile/tech-debt/gate-check/consistency-check/security-audit
QA & Testing/qa-plan/smoke-check/soak-test/regression-suite/test-setup/test-helpers/test-evidence-review/test-flakiness/skill-test/skill-improve
Production/milestone-review/retrospective/bug-report/bug-triage/reverse-document/playtest-report
Release/release-checklist/launch-checklist/changelog/patch-notes/hotfix/day-one-patch
Creative & Content/prototype/vertical-slice/onboard/localize
Team Orchestration (coordinate multiple agents on a single feature) /team-combat/team-narrative/team-ui/team-release/team-polish/team-audio/team-level/team-live-ops/team-qa
A fair question, and the answer is a measurement rather than a sample project. Four games were built from one brief at different modes.rigor levels and the documents each wrote before its first line of game code were counted:
modes.rigor | Docs before first line of game code | Time |
|---|---|---|
minimal | 1 (the one-page brief) | 0 min |
standard | 30 | 58 min |
All of them produced a running, tested game. Two blind reviewers and a human playtest then ranked the standard build last — the extra 29 documents bought traceability, not a better game.
The measurement above is about cost. The other half is whether the thing works, and for a game that means someone has to look at it — a passing test says nothing about a menu drawn off-screen. So a story that changes anything the player sees is not closed until the game has been launched, observed, and a screenshot retained in production/qa/evidence/. A parse check is not a run. This holds at every rigor level, including minimal, where automated tests are waived but the look is not.
The games themselves are deliberately not shipped here: this is a template you clone to start your own project, and somebody else's game in your repo is clutter, not evidence.
- Git
- Claude Code — the native installer is recommended (
npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-codealso works, on Node.js 22+) - Python 3 — reads
project.yamlfor every skill and hook; without it every setting silently falls back to its default - Bash — runs every hook; built into macOS and Linux, and on Windows it comes with Git for Windows
- Recommended: jq (for hook validation)
Hooks fail gracefully if optional tools are missing — you just lose validation — with one deliberate exception: a commit that stages data JSON is blocked when there is no Python to validate it.
Clone or use as template:
git clone https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git my-game cd my-gameOpen Claude Code in the project's root folder (the one holding
CLAUDE.mdandproject.yaml) and start a session:claude
Starting it in a subfolder such as
src/skips the project's hooks, deny rules and ask-first permission mode.Run
/start— the system asks where you are (no idea, vague concept, clear design, existing work) and guides you to the right workflow. No assumptions.Or jump directly to a specific skill if you already know what you need:
/brainstorm— explore game ideas from scratch/setup-engine godot 4.7— configure your engine if you already know/project-stage-detect— analyze an existing project
project.yaml at the repo root is the single source of truth for how the studio behaves on your project — engine, naming conventions, and a modes block that controls how much process every skill enforces. /start writes it for you; you rarely need to hand-edit it.
The one question that matters most is modes.rigor — minimal, standard, or full. It's a single front door over six separate knobs (workflow — which GDD sections are required, docs.density, qa.level, story_granularity, review_mode — how many director agents review your work, and team.size), so /start asks it once instead of six times:
minimal(default) — jam-game speed. No GDDs required, terse docs, minimal QA evidence, solo review./start→/setup-engine→/brainstorm(a one-page brief) →/create-stories→/dev-story↔/story-done.standard— 5 required GDD sections, balanced doc depth, standard QA evidence, lean review.full— all 8 GDD sections, thorough docs, full QA evidence on every story type, full director review.
minimal is the default because the heavier tier costs more to reach working code without producing a better result, and gives nothing back when someone new picks the project up. Raise it in one /settings call when your project grows — /help and /gate-check will suggest it when they see the signs.
Two escape hatches keep one setting from being a blunt instrument. system_overrides holds a single system to a higher standard than the rest of the project — your combat system gets the full treatment while everything else stays light. testing.strict sets, per test type (logic, integration, visual, UI, config), whether missing evidence blocks a story or merely warns.
Any of the six underlying knobs can still be set individually if you want a mix (e.g. workflow: full with docs.density: terse — comprehensive but compact). Two of them — review_mode (full / lean / solo) and team.size — are also personal: rigor sets the team-wide default, but you can override them per-developer in a gitignored project.local.yaml without touching the shared config. modes.automation (how often the AI pauses to ask before it acts) sits outside rigor and is likewise personally overridable.
View or change any setting with the /settings skill:
/settings # view effective config /settings modes.review_mode # view one setting /settings modes.rigor=full # write to project.yaml (team-wide) /settings --local modes.review_mode=solo # write to project.local.yaml (just you) Full schema and per-setting behavior: .claude/docs/effects-map.md.
Already using an older version of this template? See UPGRADING.md for step-by-step migration instructions, a breakdown of what changed between versions, and which files are safe to overwrite vs. which need a manual merge.
CLAUDE.md # Master configuration .claude/ settings.json # Hooks, permissions, safety rules agents/ # 49 agent definitions (markdown + YAML frontmatter) skills/ # 74 slash commands (subdirectory per skill) hooks/ # 18 scripts (bash) — 15 event hooks, two helpers they # source (yaml-helper.sh, update-check.sh), and one # opt-in diagnostic you wire yourself rules/ # 14 path-scoped coding standards statusline.sh # Status line script (context%, model, stage, epic breadcrumb) docs/ workflow-catalog.yaml # 7-phase pipeline definition (read by /help) templates/ # 62 document templates (+ per-section guidance) src/ # Game source code (Godot). The code root is # ENGINE-SPECIFIC: Unity compiles only # Assets/, Unreal builds from Source/<Module>/ assets/ # Art, audio, VFX, shaders, data files design/ # GDDs, narrative docs, level designs docs/ # Technical documentation and ADRs tests/ # Test suites (unit, integration, performance, playtest) tools/ # Build and pipeline tools prototypes/ # Throwaway prototypes (isolated from src/) production/ # Sprint plans, milestones, release tracking studio-tests/ # QA for the skills and agents themselves — see below CCGS is a template you are meant to edit. studio-tests/ is how you check that an edited or newly written skill still holds up — a catalog of all 74 skills and 49 agents, per-category quality rubrics, behavioral specs, and templates for writing specs of your own.
/skill-test static [name] # structural linter — 7 compliance checks /skill-test category [name] # category-specific quality rubric /skill-test spec [name] # behavioral spec assertions /skill-test audit # coverage report across skills and agents /skill-improve [name] # test-fix-retest loop; keeps or reverts on score change It tests the framework, never your game — game tests live in tests/.
Agents follow a structured delegation model:
- Vertical delegation — directors delegate to leads, leads delegate to specialists
- Horizontal consultation — same-tier agents can consult each other but can't make binding cross-domain decisions
- Conflict resolution — disagreements escalate up to the shared parent (
creative-directorfor design,technical-directorfor technical) - Change propagation — cross-department changes are coordinated by
producer - Domain boundaries — agents don't modify files outside their domain without explicit delegation
This is not an auto-pilot system. Every agent follows a strict collaboration protocol:
- Ask — agents ask questions before proposing solutions
- Present options — agents show 2-4 options with pros/cons
- You decide — the user always makes the call
- Draft — agents show work before finalizing
- Approve — nothing gets written without your sign-off
You stay in control. The agents provide structure and expertise, not autonomy.
That is how a terminal session started at the project root behaves out of the box. The guided and autonomous automation settings, and Claude Code's own auto mode, trade some of these prompts for speed; see setup-requirements.md for the routes into auto mode.
Hooks run automatically on every session:
| Hook | Trigger | What It Does |
|---|---|---|
validate-commit.sh | PreToolUse (Bash, PowerShell) | Checks for hardcoded values, TODO format, JSON validity, design doc sections — exits early if the command is not git commit |
validate-push.sh | PreToolUse (Bash, PowerShell) | Warns on pushes to protected branches, and on git tag, git merge, gh release, butler push and steamcmd +run_app_build — exits early for any other command |
validate-read.sh | PreToolUse (Read) | Refuses a whole-file read of a design doc over 40 KB and answers with its headings, so the retry reads one section (features.read_guard) |
validate-write.sh | PreToolUse (Write/Edit) | Warns, never blocks, when a write would break a rule the skills state: a file they never overwrite, the config guard, the prototype boundary, a localization freeze |
validate-registry.sh | PreToolUse (Write/Edit) | Warns when a write to the entity or TR-ID registry would delete or renumber an entry, or set a status its header does not list |
validate-assets.sh | PostToolUse (Write/Edit) | Checks data-file JSON under assets/, Assets/ or Content/, and asset naming in Godot's assets/ only — exits early if the file is under none of them |
session-start.sh | Session open | Shows current branch and recent commits for orientation |
detect-gaps.sh | Session open | Detects fresh projects (suggests /start) and missing design docs when code or prototypes exist |
pre-compact.sh | Before compaction | Logs the compaction (its output does not reach Claude — session-start.sh restores context afterwards) |
notify.sh | Permission prompt, or idle about a minute | Shows Windows toast notification via PowerShell |
session-stop.sh | Every response end, in the background | Archives active.md to session log and records git activity |
log-agent.sh | Agent spawned | Audit trail start — logs subagent invocation |
log-agent-stop.sh | Agent stops | Audit trail stop — completes subagent record |
validate-agent-artifact.sh | Agent stops | Warns when a subagent stops without writing the file its brief named |
validate-skill-change.sh | PostToolUse (Write/Edit) | Advises running /skill-test after any .claude/skills/ change |
Note:
validate-commit.sh,validate-push.sh,validate-read.sh,validate-write.sh,validate-registry.sh,validate-assets.shandvalidate-skill-change.shfire on every Bash, PowerShell, Read, Write or Edit tool call and exit immediately (exit 0) when the command or file path is not relevant. This is normal hook behavior — not a performance concern.
Permission rules in settings.json auto-allow test runs and block dangerous operations (force push, rm -rf, reading .env files) in both the Bash and PowerShell tools. Read-only commands such as git status, git log and ls need no rule: Claude Code runs them without asking. The git rules match anywhere after git, so a git command whose text only mentions push followed later by + or -f, clean followed by -f, or reset followed by --hard — a commit message such as git commit -m "push + pull" included — is denied too: reword the message.
Coding standards are automatically enforced based on file location. The paths below are Godot's. Each rule also matches the Unity and Unreal layouts: the code rules match C# under Assets/**/Gameplay/ and C++ under Source/**/Gameplay/ (and Core, AI, Networking, UI), data matches JSON under Assets/**/Data/ and Content/**/Data/, shaders match by file type, and tests match C# under Assets/Tests/ and C++ under Source/**/Tests/.
| Path | Enforces |
|---|---|
src/gameplay/** | Data-driven values, delta time usage, no UI references |
src/core/** | Zero allocations in hot paths, thread safety, API stability |
src/ai/** | Performance budgets, debuggability, data-driven parameters |
src/networking/** | Server-authoritative, versioned messages, security |
src/ui/** | No game state ownership, localization-ready, accessibility |
design/gdd/** | Required sections per modes.workflow, formula format, edge cases |
design/narrative/** | Lore consistency, character voice, canon levels |
assets/data/**/*.json | JSON validity, naming conventions, schema rules |
assets/shaders/** | Naming conventions, performance targets, cross-platform rules |
**/*.tscn, **/*.tres | Scene and resource files changed in the editor where possible; safe hand-edit rules |
tests/** | Test naming, coverage requirements, fixture patterns |
prototypes/** | Relaxed standards, README required, hypothesis documented |
This template is grounded in professional game development practices:
- MDA Framework — Mechanics, Dynamics, Aesthetics analysis for game design
- Self-Determination Theory — Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness for player motivation
- Flow State Design — Challenge-skill balance for player engagement
- Bartle Player Types — Audience targeting and validation
- Verification-Driven Development — Tests first, then implementation
This is a template, not a locked framework. Everything is meant to be customized:
- Add/remove agents — delete agent files you don't need, add new ones for your domains
- Edit agent prompts — tune agent behavior, add project-specific knowledge
- Modify skills — adjust workflows to match your team's process
- Add rules — create new path-scoped rules for your project's directory structure
- Tune hooks — adjust validation strictness, add new checks
- Pick your engine — use the Godot, Unity, or Unreal agent set (or none)
- Tune process weight —
modes.rigorand its underlying knobs inproject.yaml(see Configuration). Override per-run with--review soloon any skill.
Primary development on Windows 10 with Git Bash. The hooks and scripts are also tested on macOS — its stock bash 3.2 and BSD tools, with and without jq — and on Linux. All hooks use POSIX-compatible patterns (grep -E, not grep -P) and include fallbacks for missing tools. The notify.sh hook uses PowerShell for Windows toast notifications and is a no-op elsewhere — desktop notifications on macOS/Linux are not yet wired. Please file issues for any platform-specific breakage.
- Discussions — 1988 Rich.club for questions, ideas, and showcasing what you've built
- Issues — Rezeki44
Claude Code Game Studios is free and open source. If it saves you time or helps you ship your game, consider supporting continued development:
- Buy Me a Coffee — one-time support
- Deposit Belum Dikreditkan — recurring support through GitHub
Sponsorships help fund time spent maintaining skills, adding new agents, keeping up with Claude Code and engine API changes, and responding to community issues.
Built for Claude Code. Maintained and extended — contributions welcome via GitHub Discussions.
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.