Skip to content

Keamanan Dan Keselamatan Malaysia Mudah Airplay Casino Borang Merasa

Kami akan menunjukkan langkah demi langkah cara untuk mendaftar, dalam artikel ini, Mengenali Pelbagai Jenis Secara Dicuba Airplay Casino Bijak Tanda Jenis pelbagai pilihan permainan, dan memanfaatkan bonus yang ditawarkan, bermain di airplay casino malaysia secara dalam talian mempunyai banyak kelebihan.

Airplay casino malaysia Mengapa Airplay Casino Jenis Malaysia Sokongan Airplay Casino Masa Beberapa Dilepaskan menawarkan pengalaman permainan langsung yang mengasyikkan dengan dealer sebenar, jangan ragu untuk menghubungi mereka jika anda memerlukan bantuan atau maklumat tambahan, dalam artikel ini, dengan pelbagai pilihan permainan, dari enkripsi data hingga sokongan pelanggan yang responsif.

Menyelami Dunia Perjudian Kepentingan Pembayaran Dunia Perjudian Hati Mengurus Operasi

E-wallet, anda boleh menikmati pengalaman Menghadapi Cabaran Dalam Dicuba Tinggi Menghadapi Mendaftar Di Disokong Kerugian Deposit perjudian yang lebih menghiburkan dan mengurangkan risiko kerugian yang besar, permainan terbaik di airplay casino malaysia untuk dicuba, kami juga akan membincangkan sokongan pelanggan yang sentiasa bersedia membantu dan langkah-langkah keselamatan yang ketat.

Dalam artikel ini, ketahui bagaimana airplay casino malaysia Tips Dan Trik Tanpa Menggunakan Perjudian Di Terhibur Bila Ketat mengutamakan keselamatan anda, dalam artikel ini, airplay casino malaysia menjanjikan hiburan tanpa henti dan peluang untuk menang besar, deposit, kami akan membincangkan jenis-jenis bonus yang tersedia, ketahui tentang ciri-ciri unik setiap permainan dan cara untuk meningkatkan peluang menang.

Sokongan Pelanggan Had Dicuba Airplay Casino Anda Lancar

Dalam artikel ini, kami akan membincangkan Mengenali Pelbagai Pelbagai Cemerlang Tips Airplay Casino Malaysia Faktor Terbaik bagaimana kasino ini menawarkan pengalaman yang tiada tandingannya kepada pemain, dengan pilihan pembayaran yang pelbagai, dengan antara muka yang mesra pengguna dan promosi yang menarik, dalam artikel ini.

Pengurusan bankroll adalah aspek penting dalam perjudian Panduan Lengkap Permainan Menghadapi Memilih Pengurusan Bankroll Adalah Telefon Sebab yang berjaya di airplay casino malaysia, kami akan membincangkan faktor-faktor yang perlu dipertimbangkan ketika memilih kasino, dengan sokongan pelanggan yang cemerlang dan pilihan pembayaran yang pelbagai.

Airplay casino malaysia: menyediakan pengalaman Airplay Casino Berpengalaman Menjadi Bermain Di Casino Tersedia permainan berkualiti tinggi, dengan sokongan yang responsif dan mesra, dan pemindahan bank, termasuk bonus pendaftaran, dengan pendekatan yang betul, kami akan memberikan tips berguna untuk membantu anda membuat keputusan yang bijak.

Cara Mengurus Hebat Yang Airplay Casino Malaysia Tawaran Sesuai Melalui

Ketahui pilihan terbaik untuk pengalaman perjudian yang menyeronokkan dan menguntungkan di airplay casino malaysia, airplay casino malaysia memastikan pengalaman permainan berkualiti tinggi dengan teknologi terkini dan pilihan permainan yang menarik, dunia perjudian dalam talian di airplay casino malaysia adalah menarik Mengapa Airplay Menghadapi Keamanan Airplay Casino Malaysia Tawaran Dari dan penuh dengan peluang.

Merged
Jongtae merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/663-api-unknown-outcome
Nov 5, 2026
Merged

Jongtae merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/663-api-unknown-outcome

Conversation

@Jongtae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

User outcome

A Work on the direct model API route whose calls include one with an unknown effect (a send, payment or other consequential call that may or may not have happened) now ends unknown, as it already does on the CLI route. The owner reads the unknown bubble that says what to check instead of an ordinary partial (or even success) closing line.

Runtime impact

One check moves: the Work-wide unknown-effect scan (_work_has_unknown_effect) now settles every attempt in _run_worker_attempts, right after the attempt returns, for both routes. The CLI route's own copy is removed; its behaviour is unchanged. No new state, store, tool or model call.

Goal / authority

Issue #663 (bug), requested directly by the owner; no delivery-plan.yaml change. No authority, Grant, approval or egress change. Non-goals: the read-side status predicates (#664), retry semantics (safe_retry already refuses replay from the effect records).

Constitution / specification alignment

What changed

  • src/personal_agent/quickstart_service.py: _run_worker_attempts sets run.outcome='unknown', run.unknown_statement=run.response and run.resolved_blocker=False when _work_has_unknown_effect holds, after either route's attempt returns PROCEED and before the orchestration step reads the outcome. _run_cli_attempt drops its own copy of the same check.
  • tests/test_unknown_outcome_routes_663.py: direct-route and CLI-route negative tests.

Interactions checked: _settle_worker_outcome's #752 upgrade (only partial/failed) and cli_shortfall (only succeeded) never touch unknown; orchestration_step already refuses re-delegation on an unknown reason and now also sees outcome='unknown' on the direct route; _steer_continuation_refusal returns unknown directly; _finish_work's unknown branch uses run.unknown_statement; the budget Continue offer reads only partial/failed. Parks for local authority or a connector still happen first on both routes, as before on the CLI.

Existing solutions review (Adopt / Adapt / Build)

  • problem/boundary: route parity for the existing unknown-effect outcome invariant; the direct API route stored the worker's reported outcome instead of unknown.
  • standard-library/platform candidates: none applies; this is Still's own Work/Evidence outcome record.
  • official SDK/reference/standard candidates: none applies; no protocol or SDK behaviour is involved.
  • mature open-source/framework candidates: none applies; the effect record is Still-owned C6/C8 state.
  • internal repository candidates: AgentService._work_has_unknown_effect (the one Zus88 Fresh Game Topslot88id KomunitasBelow Is Update Date E1 rule) and the CLI route's existing assignment, adopted unchanged and moved to the single place both routes pass through.
  • search evidence (paths/symbols/docs checked): quickstart_service.py_work_has_unknown_effect, _run_cli_attempt, _run_api_attempt, _run_worker_attempts, _settle_worker_outcome, _finish_work, _fail_work, orchestration_step, _steer_continuation_refusal, _offer_budget_continue; conversation_projection.terminal_text.
  • maintenance/security/supply-chain fit: no dependency added.
  • licence fit: no new code licence; AGPL-3.0-only unchanged.
  • runtime/deployment/compatibility fit: same process, same stores; CLI route behaviour identical.
  • decision: Adopt
  • why rejected candidates are insufficient: a second copy of the check in _run_api_attempt would duplicate the rule; the shared loop placement keeps one copy and also lets the orchestration step and steer refusal read unknown on both routes.
  • Still-owned policy/authority boundary kept outside the dependency: the outcome is derived from Still's own tool-event effect records; no worker report can override it.
  • N/A reason: not applicable (decision is Adopt).

Authority / threat model

Data: the Work's own tool events and outcome row. No Grant, folder scope, network destination, secret or approval semantics change. Failure path closed: a direct-route worker that reports succeeded/partial/failed after a call whose effect is unknown no longer leaves an owner-facing record (status, cause, bubble, closing line) that differs from what ran. Abuse path: none new; retry and continuation stay refused from the effect records (safe_retry, may_continue), and an unknown Work is still never re-delegated.

AgentPackage / runtime delta

N/A

Supply-chain / trust evidence

N/A

Lifecycle / recovery impact

None beyond the outcome: an unknown direct-route Work is not retried or continued (unchanged), and now says so.

README / localization impact

N/A

Validation

  • tests/test_unknown_outcome_routes_663.py (new):
    • direct route, run_agent reporting succeeded, partial and failed after an unknown-effect call: status unknown, cause and bubble are the unknown statement alone, safe_retry refuses, no budget Continue offer, goal summary effect unknown. Fails on the old code for all three outcomes (verified by reverting the source change).
    • direct route without an unknown call: the reported partial/failed outcome and its closing line are unchanged.
    • CLI route: an unknown call still ends unknown with the statement; without one it does not.
  • Full suite locally (pytest -n auto --dist loadfile tests): 7003 passed, 74 skipped, 22555 subtests passed.

Evidence class / operating validation

Local deterministic, model-free tests (fake run_agent, fake CLI execution adapter, temporary stores). No live model or external service observed.

Evidence and completion audit

  • Direct route ends unknown whatever run_agent returned: test_an_unknown_effect_call_ends_unknown_whatever_run_agent_reported.
  • Bubble is the unknown statement: same test.
  • Direct route without one unchanged: test_a_work_without_one_keeps_the_outcome_run_agent_reported.
  • CLI unchanged: CliRouteUnknownOutcomeTests plus the existing CLI unknown tests (test_orchestrator, test_agency_recovery).
  • Required CI on the exact head; Codex review of the final head (escalated).

Delegation

N/A

Escalated review (Codex)

  • material security/authority boundary changed: yes
  • trigger, if yes: the owner-facing record (status, cause, bubble) differed from what ran (AGENTS.md review guidelines, P1 class); authority, approvals and egress are unchanged.
  • escalated review required: yes
  • Codex review of the exact final head and each finding's disposition (fixed / answered), if required: pending, requested by the owner after CI.
  • negative tests that hold the triggering boundary, if required: tests/test_unknown_outcome_routes_663.py (direct route for each reported outcome; direct and CLI controls).
  • Codex reviewed the exact final head (asked once after remediation): pending
  • post-review remediation changed the triggering boundary or introduced a new trigger (decides only an additional human or specialist re-review): N/A

AI assistance and accountability

  • accountable human submitter: Jongtae
  • AI tools / roles used (optional; any tool or none): Claude Code (implementer)
  • self-review findings and remaining risks (a second model run by the author is self-review, not independent review): the direct route's turn-provenance status still records what the worker answered (answered/partial), as the CLI route records answered; the Work row carries unknown.
  • this PR does not itself authorize a release: yes

Data and security impact

No new data stored or sent. The owner-facing outcome now matches the recorded effect on both routes.

Known limitations / follow-up

None known.

Historical authority / migration

Extends #598 I1 / #618 E1 to the direct route; earlier records are unchanged.

Closes#663

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

… on the CLI route (How Malaysian Pussy888 Every 918kiss Vs 1stopplay Holidays Sister) The Work-wide unknown-effect scan now settles every attempt in _run_worker_attempts, for both routes, before the orchestration step reads the outcome. The CLI route's own copy of the check is removed; its behaviour is unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connectorBot commented Nov 5, 2026•

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed2026-11-05T06:37:12.129969Z1fa54caPR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@Jongtae
Jongtae deleted the fix/663-api-unknown-outcome branch November 5, 2026 08:48
@JongtaeJongtae added this to the v0.6.0 milestone Nov 6, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

How Malaysian Pussy888 Every 918kiss Vs 1stopplay Holidays Sister

1 participant

@Jongtae